<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leonard Family Legends and Legacies &#187; Gregorian calendar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickleonard.net/tag/gregorian-calendar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickleonard.net</link>
	<description>Leonard Family History</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Double-dating ancestors</title>
		<link>http://www.rickleonard.net/2009/04/double-dating-ancestors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rickleonard.net/2009/04/double-dating-ancestors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Legends &#38; Legacies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double-dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregorian calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History's Mysteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian calendar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickleonard.net/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you double-date your ancestors? Wait. It's not as icky as it sounds. What I mean to say is... have you ever run across an ancestor who's double-dated? Uh, let me start over.

This particular brand of double-dating presented itself in my family history software when it refused to accept a date of 15 Feb 1733. The software kept insisting the date should be 15 Feb 1732/33.

Wuzzup wit dat?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.rickleonard.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/doubledating252x252c.jpg" alt="doubledating252x252c" title="doubledating252x252c" width="252" height="252" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-982" />Do you double-date your ancestors? Wait. It&#8217;s not as icky as it sounds. What I mean to say is&#8230; have you ever run across an ancestor who&#8217;s double-dated? Uh, let me start over.</p>
<p>This particular brand of double-dating presented itself in my family history software when it refused to accept a date of 15 Feb 1733. The software kept insisting the date should be 15 Feb 1732/33. </p>
<p>Wuzzup wit dat? I deleted 32/33, tried again. Same result. I tried all fourteen different ways to delete and correct a date, to no avail. </p>
<p>When all else failed, &#8216;cuz that&#8217;s the way I do things &#8217;round here, I decided to try the Help files. (Props to you if you already know the answer here, it took me a good long while to figure it out.) Seems there&#8217;s a difference of opinion between the Julian and Gregorian calendars. </p>
<p>Julius Caesar, after consulting with his chief astronomer, came up with a pretty durn good calendar in 46 B.C. It had 365 days and added a leap day every four years. Problem was, it was off&#8230; by just a few minutes. By the time Pope Gregory XIII (Thirteen, to his friends) noticed in 1582, the Julian calendar was off by several <em>days</em>.</p>
<p>So the Pope set things straight in 1582, but true to form, it took the Britain and American colonies until <em>1752</em> to get up to speed. By then, the Julian calendar was off by eleven days. Further complicating matters, the Julian calendar started on March 25th, <em>not</em> New Year&#8217;s Day.</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s where it gets nasty. A good many countries adopted the Gregorian calendar right away. And as British and American record keepers began to feel more and more self-conscious about their <em>old</em> calendar, some of them started converting to the new Gregorian calendar before it was mandated. That&#8217;s problem number one.</p>
<p>Problem number two, is that anything that happened, for example, in January, February, or the first 25 days of March of 1733 on the <em>old</em> calendar actually happened in 1732 on the <em>new</em> one. Thus the reason my family history software insisted on double-dating my ancestor. <em>This</em> kind of double-dating went on for nearly two <em>centuries</em>.</p>
<p>And you thought Y2K was a pain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rickleonard.net/2009/04/double-dating-ancestors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
